Hadith 4961

حَدَّثَنَا أَحْمَدُ بْنُ حَنْبَلٍ ، حَدَّثَنَا سُفْيَانُ بْنُ عُيَيْنَةَ ، عَنْ أَبِي الزِّنَادِ ، عَنْ الْأَعْرَجِ ، عَنْ أَبِي هُرَيْرَةَ يَبْلُغُ بِهِ النَّبِيَّ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ ، قَالَ : " أَخْنَعُ : اسْمٍ عِنْدَ اللَّهِ تَبَارَكَ وَتَعَالَى يَوْمَ الْقِيَامَةِ رَجُلٌ تَسَمَّى مَلِكَ الْأَمْلَاكِ " , قَالَ أبو داود : رَوَاهُ شُعَيْبُ بْنُ أَبِي حَمْزَةَ ، عَنْ أَبِي الزِّنَادِ بِإِسْنَادِهِ ، قَالَ : أَخْنَى اسْمٍ .
Abu Hurairah reported the prophet ﷺ as saying: The vilest names in Allah’s sight on the Day of resurrection will be that of a man called Malik al-Amlak. Abu Dawud said: This tradition has also been transmitted by Shuaib bin Abi Hamzah from Abi al-Zinad through different chain of narrators. This version has the words "akhna' ismin" (most obscene name) instead of "akhna ismin" (the vilest name).
Hadith Reference سنن ابي داود / كتاب الأدب / 4961
Hadith Grading الألبانی: صحيح  |  زبیر علی زئی: صحيح بخاري (6206) صحيح مسلم (2143)
Hadith Takhrij « صحیح البخاری/الأدب 114 (6206)، صحیح مسلم/الأداب 4 (2143)، سنن الترمذی/الأدب 65 (2837)، (تحفة الأشراف: 13672)، وقد أخرجہ: مسند احمد (2/244) (صحیح) »
Explanation & Benefits
Shaykh Umar Farooq Saeedi
Benefits and Issues:
The esteemed scholars have also declared it impermissible to be called or to call someone "Qadi al-Qudat" (Chief Judge) in the aforementioned manner.
Source: Sunan Abu Dawood – Commentary by Shaykh Umar Farooq Saeedi, Page: 4961
Maulana Dawood Raz
Hadith Commentary:

The word "Akhna" means extremely worst, extremely vile. The worst and most vile name is that people call someone "King of Kings." Those who bear such names will be the worst people on the Day of Resurrection.
Source: Sahih Bukhari: Commentary by Maulana Dawood Raz, Page: 6205
Shaykh Maulana Abdul Aziz Alvi
Hadith Commentary:
Vocabulary of the Hadith:
"Akhn'a" means "most abased":
The most humiliated,
according to Khalil.
"Afjar":
The worst,
disgraceful.

Benefits and Issues:
Imam Sufyan rahimahullah has translated "Malik al-Muluk" as "Shahan Shah,"
which is a Persian term,
the purpose of which is to clarify that not only is "Malik al-Muluk" the most abased and worst name,
but any name in any language that carries this meaning and concept holds the same ruling,
such as "Khaliq al-Khalq" (Creator of creation),
"Ahkam al-Hakimeen" (Most Just of judges),
"Sultan al-Salateen" (Sultan of sultans),
"Amir al-Umara" (Commander of commanders), and according to some, every name that is specific to Allah Ta'ala,
holds the same ruling,
such as "Jabbar" (Compeller),
"Qahhar" (Subduer),
"Rahman" (Most Merciful),
"Quddus" (Most Holy), etc.
Therefore, according to the Shari'ah, it is not permissible to adopt such names.
Source: Tuhfat al-Muslim: Commentary on Sahih Muslim, Page: 5610
Shaykh Muhammad Ibrahim bin Basheer
Benefit:
In this hadith, one of the attributes of Allah Ta'ala is mentioned, and that is «ملك الا ملاك», which in Urdu is called "Shahenshah" (Sovereign/King of Kings). That is, even the wealthiest person in the world should not be called "Shahenshah"; only Allah Ta'ala is the true Shahenshah. Furthermore, it is not permissible to interpret (ta'wil), liken (tashbih), specify the modality (takyeef), or deny (ta'til) the attributes of Allah Ta'ala.
Source: Musnad al-Humaydi: Commentary by Muhammad Ibrahim bin Bashir, Page: 1159