Narrated Anas ibn Malik: I never saw the Messenger of Allah ﷺ that some dispute which involved retaliation was brought to him but he commanded regarding it for remission.
Hadith Referenceسنن ابي داود / كتاب الديات / 4497
Hadith Gradingالألبانی:صحيح | زبیر علی زئی:إسناده صحيح, أخرجه النسائي (4787 وسنده صحيح) وابن ماجه (2692 وسنده صحيح)
Hadith Takhrij« سنن النسائی/القسامة 23 (4787، 4788)، سنن ابن ماجہ/الدیات 35 (2692)، (تحفة الأشراف: 1095)، وقد أخرجہ: مسند احمد (3/213، 252) (صحیح) »
Benefits and Issues: A judge (qadi) or ruler (hakim) can encourage the parties involved to pardon the matter, but they themselves do not possess any right to pardon on their own accord. If they do pardon, it is a great injustice, as is the common practice of our governments.
Source: Sunan Abu Dawood – Commentary by Shaykh Umar Farooq Saeedi, Page: 4497
´It was narrated that Anas bin Malik said:` "No case requiring Qisas was ever brought to the Messenger of Allah but he would enjoin pardoning."
Hafiz Muhammad Ameen
It is understood that forgiving is superior, provided that the other party seeks forgiveness with humility. If he is in pride and arrogance, or seeks forgiveness by force, then retribution (qisas) and retaliation are superior. Furthermore, after forgiveness, blood money (diyah) must necessarily be given so that the sanctity of life is maintained.
Source: Sunan Nasa'i: Translation and Benefits by Shaykh Hafiz Muhammad Amin Hafizullah, Page: 4788
´It was narrated that 'Ata bin Abu Maimunah said:` “I only know it from Anas bin Malik who said: 'No case involving retaliation was referred to the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) but he enjoined forgiveness.”
Maulana Ataullah Sajid
Benefits and Issues: ➊ Retaliation (qisas) is permissible, but forgiving is superior.
➋ The ruler may advise both parties to pardon or reconcile, but it is not obligatory for the concerned party to accept this advice.
Source: Commentary on Sunan Ibn Mājah by Mawlānā ‘Atā’ullāh Sājid, Page: 2692