Hadith 2075

حَدَّثَنَا مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ يَحْيَى بْنِ فَارِسٍ ، حَدَّثَنَا يَعْقُوبُ بْنُ إِبْرَاهِيمَ ، حَدَّثَنَا أَبِي ، عَنْ ابْنِ إِسْحَاقَ ، حَدَّثَنِي عَبْدُ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنُ هُرْمُزَ الْأَعْرَجُ ، أَنَّ الْعَبَّاسَ بْنَ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ بْنِ الْعَبَّاسِ أَنْكَحَ عَبْدَ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنَ الْحَكَمِ ابْنَتَهُ وَأَنْكَحَهُ عَبْدُ الرَّحْمَنِ ابْنَتَهُ وَكَانَا جَعَلَا صَدَاقًا ، فَكَتَبَ مُعَاوِيَةُ إِلَى مَرْوَانَ يَأْمُرُهُ بِالتَّفْرِيقِ بَيْنَهُمَا ، وَقَالَ فِي كِتَابِهِ : " هَذَا الشِّغَارُ الَّذِي نَهَى عَنْهُ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ " .
Abdur Rahman ibn Hurmuz al-Araj said: Al-Abbas ibn Abdullah ibn al-Abbas married his daughter to Abdur Rahman ibn al-Hakam, and Abdur Rahman married his daughter to him. And they made this (exchange) their dower. Muawiyah wrote to Marwan commanding him to separate them. He wrote in his letter: This is the shighar which the Messenger of Allah ﷺ has forbidden.
Hadith Reference سنن ابي داود / كتاب النكاح / 2075
Hadith Grading الألبانی: حسن  |  زبیر علی زئی: إسناده حسن
Hadith Takhrij « تفرد بہ أبو داود، مسند احمد (4/94)، ( تحفة الأشراف: 11429) (حسن) »
Explanation & Benefits
Shaykh Umar Farooq Saeedi
Benefits and Issues:
➊ In the phrase (wa kana ja‘ala sadaqan), the first object (maf‘ul awwal) of (ja‘ala) is omitted, as is made explicit in the wording of this same narration in Mawarid al-Zhaman ila Zawa’id Ibn Hibban: (wa qad kana ja‘alahu sadaqan) (Mawarid al-Zhaman, Bab ma ja’a fi al-shi‘ar, Hadith: 1268). From this, it becomes clear that the reason for the ruling of separation by Mu‘awiyah radi Allahu anhu was making the condition of exchange itself the bridal gift (mahr), not the mere exchange of two sisters or two daughters despite having fixed a bridal gift.

➋ There is consensus among all scholars on the prohibition of nikah shighar (exchange marriage). If someone performs it, al-Shafi‘i rahimahullah considers it invalid (batil). The same is narrated from Ahmad, Ishaq, and Abu ‘Ubayd rahimahumullah. Imam Malik rahimahullah says that it should be annulled (fasakh), whether consummation (dukhul) has taken place or not, although he also has an opinion that it should be annulled before consummation, not after. According to a group of scholars, it becomes valid by paying a bridal gift equivalent to the customary amount (mahr mithl). This is also the school of Imam Abu Hanifah rahimahullah, and it is similarly narrated from ‘Ata’, al-Zuhri, and al-Layth rahimahumullah. One narration from Ahmad and Ishaq rahimahumullah is also to this effect.
Source: Sunan Abu Dawood – Commentary by Shaykh Umar Farooq Saeedi, Page: 2075